<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Versioning for HTML, or Microsoft saving face?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/</link>
	<description>Pixelbox, technology development and photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:26:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pixelbox &#187; Microsoft in standards u-turn</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/comment-page-1/#comment-29092</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixelbox &#187; Microsoft in standards u-turn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/#comment-29092</guid>
		<description>[...] will remember I posted about this issue when Microsoft first announced they plan for IE8, expressing my concerns. It looks like Microsoft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will remember I posted about this issue when Microsoft first announced they plan for IE8, expressing my concerns. It looks like Microsoft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/comment-page-1/#comment-26210</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/#comment-26210</guid>
		<description>Sorry Andrew, not sure why that is. Will look into it at some point!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Andrew, not sure why that is. Will look into it at some point!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/comment-page-1/#comment-26204</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/#comment-26204</guid>
		<description>And you still haven&#039;t fixed paragraph spacing on you blog yet :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you still haven&#8217;t fixed paragraph spacing on you blog yet :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/comment-page-1/#comment-26203</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/#comment-26203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Surely IE7 users are used to viewing a broken web so a new MS browser will still break the pages they look at but only in a different way.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Seriously though, this has been coming for a long time so it should be of no shock that Microsoft is proposing these actions. Should it? They always throw their weight around and they&#039;ll never publicly admit they were wrong (although their actions say otherwise) because they have an army of corporate customers behind them screaming about their ROI!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Incidently these customers are as much to blame as anyone, historically corporate IT policies have gone a long way in determining target browsers and maybe it&#039;s time they realise that their developers didn&#039;t talk about web standards for the fun of it (although I understand a lot of them actually do :))
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Oh and one last thing if IE wasn&#039;t so intrisically linked with the OS then &#039;average&#039; IE users would have a choice about the browser they use. As it currently stands MS doesn&#039;t provide it&#039;s users with a choice of which version of their browser to run. At the moment the choice is stay where you are, windows update to the latest version or choose Firefox, Safari, Opera etc. I think that this was a bigger business mistake than branching away from the standards in the first place. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Anyway just my two pennies worth.Take it with a pinch of salt.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely IE7 users are used to viewing a broken web so a new MS browser will still break the pages they look at but only in a different way.
</p>
<p>
Seriously though, this has been coming for a long time so it should be of no shock that Microsoft is proposing these actions. Should it? They always throw their weight around and they&#8217;ll never publicly admit they were wrong (although their actions say otherwise) because they have an army of corporate customers behind them screaming about their ROI!
</p>
<p>
Incidently these customers are as much to blame as anyone, historically corporate IT policies have gone a long way in determining target browsers and maybe it&#8217;s time they realise that their developers didn&#8217;t talk about web standards for the fun of it (although I understand a lot of them actually do :))
</p>
<p>
Oh and one last thing if IE wasn&#8217;t so intrisically linked with the OS then &#8216;average&#8217; IE users would have a choice about the browser they use. As it currently stands MS doesn&#8217;t provide it&#8217;s users with a choice of which version of their browser to run. At the moment the choice is stay where you are, windows update to the latest version or choose Firefox, Safari, Opera etc. I think that this was a bigger business mistake than branching away from the standards in the first place.
</p>
<p>
Anyway just my two pennies worth.Take it with a pinch of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/comment-page-1/#comment-26199</link>
		<dc:creator>Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelbox.net/2008/01/23/versioning-for-html-or-microsoft-saving-face/#comment-26199</guid>
		<description>I think M$&#039; answer is as good as anyone else&#039;s... I&#039;d just sooner there had been an open discussion about it before they went off and did their own thing. Just when we thought they were getting better too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think M$&#8217; answer is as good as anyone else&#8217;s&#8230; I&#8217;d just sooner there had been an open discussion about it before they went off and did their own thing. Just when we thought they were getting better too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
